In my fourteen plus years with Unica, I’ve been lucky enough to be involved with some incredible projects that delivered outstanding achievements using our software. My personal favorite example was when one of our customers consolidated over two hundred newsletter campaigns for individual newspaper publications into a single lights-out campaign. Let me repeat that- from two hundred individual campaigns to one. That is a serious amount of time and money saved every week, week-on-week.

Another favorite example of mine is when a major UK retailer invested a couple of million dollars in building a completely new data warehouse and implementing Unica. The uplift attributed to coupon redemption in the very first campaign paid for the entire project. When these tools are implemented right, the rewards aren’t just observable and tangible; they’re staggering. And my experience in the vast number of cases is overwhelmingly positive.

But what I want to talk about in this article are some of the obstacles to achieving these results. There was one occasion where I encountered a situation where, despite doing our best, adoption of the suite was only partially successful, and some modules were ultimately replaced. Why? Because in being aware of these situations, we can watch out for the markers in the future and hopefully intervene in time. Those that don’t learn history are doomed to repeat it. Failure is only absolute when we learn nothing from it.

So what was different in this particular case? The Unica delivery team was the same. The software was the same. The customer’s senior management team’s appetite to make the implementation success was there, and they were active and present. The appetite from the users to make the project a success was there too. The main representative from the user team was skilled, intelligent, and inventive. The partner team was talented, dedicated, and approachable.

All of the building blocks were there to make this endeavor a roaring success, yet it wasn’t. In one key area, the adoption of the digital messaging module, it was an abject failure – why? I’ve spent over five years thinking about this, and there are several factors. Each party contributed to the failure in its own subtle way in their own area. The initial implementation went well, and the solution went live as planned. My role was as Technical Account Manager, providing at least one day per week of my time solely dedicated to this customer’s success over a couple of years.

Unica Deliver- A business use case

The solution was remotely hosted, administrated, and managed by a partner organization. They were responsible for ingesting and transforming the data, ensuring that this was available to the customer’s data team that would create campaigns within the Unica Campaign. The partner’s problem was that their service had a single point of failure. A particularly talented individual in their team was responsible for data loads and correcting problems. When he decided to leave the firm to set up his own consultancy business, the technical knowledge of the ETL and data layer of the solution left with him.

The customer user team was under a severe amount of pressure – they were expected to deliver day-to-day production campaigns on top of implementing new ways of working. Over time it became increasingly difficult for them to adopt new ways of working. They’d often find a way of doing things and stick with that way, even though there were huge opportunities for automation. When I wrote a report that proposed clear recommendations on how to make the most of their automation opportunities, the Data Manager claimed that they were “not there yet.” A couple of defects in the digital messaging software gave the team a negative impression – despite these defects being quickly fixed and straightforward workarounds being provided, there was an air of negativity about the product that was understandable at the beginning, harder to understand as time went on.

Pretty soon after going live, a new Chief Marketing Officer was appointed. His marketing strategy was understandable, achievable and innovation was a key factor of this strategy. He pulled people together to influence a successful outcome, but it soon became apparent that the marketing automation space was new to him, and he gave the impression that he just wanted it to work without being bothered by the details and fully understand either the pressure on his team or the potential of the technology. My own personal failure was being unable to gain buy-in to adopt the most powerful productivity features. The customer’s leadership team had an appetite for the software to be used innovatively, and the right recommendations were made, but the Data Manager simply refused to commit to implementing the recommendations and ultimately influenced the management team to look for a new digital messaging tool.

Unica Deliver- Strategic Implementation

Despite the right building blocks being in place, the right recommendations being put forward, the right strategy being communicated, the writing was on the wall for that module. So, what was the key factor in this instance? After thinking about this for over five years, I believe the answer to be the mortar. In this case, the mortar that was lacking was strategy implementation.

The marketing strategy contained the right words. The software demonstrably could achieve what the business wanted it to achieve. The users were clearly capable and could have made it work but were unable to invest the time needed to implement the most powerful automation features that really made the product come alive. What was absent was any monitoring of strategy implementation. This created a gap between senior management and the user base.

Part of strategic implementation is the continuous monitoring of strategic objectives. You want your team to be innovative? How do you plan to measure that? You want your team to understand the customer? How do you plan to measure that? You want to grow faster than the competition? How do you plan to measure that? If you’re not willing to invest in and then monitor strategy implementation you might as well not write the strategy in the first place.

Unica Deliver- Email Automation and Custom templates

No software tool is perfect. Every tool has its strengths and weaknesses. Unica Deliver’s core strength is its automation and productivity features. If you leverage these features, you will save money. To learn more about Unica Deliver you can reach out to the Unica team and we would be happy to help.

Comment wrap
Further Reading
Marketing & Commerce | November 17, 2020
Unica Named a November 2020 Gartner Peer Insights Customers’ Choice for Multichannel Marketing Hub.
HCL Software is excited to announce that Unica, a leading enterprise marketing solution, has been recognized as a November 2020 Gartner Peer Insights Customers’ Choice for Multichannel Marketing Hub (MMH). Our team at Unica takes great pride in this distinction, as customer feedback continues to shape our products and services. In its announcement, Gartner explains, “The Gartner Peer Insights Customers’ Choice is a recognition of vendors in this market by verified end-user professionals, taking into account both the number of reviews and the overall user ratings.” To ensure fair evaluation, Gartner maintains rigorous criteria for recognizing vendors with a high customer satisfaction rate. Here are some excerpts from customers that contributed to the distinction: “A solid product with deep user community and good integrator expertise in region.”- Head Of Marketing Data & Analytics in the Finance Industry “HCL Unica is a great Campaign Management tool which generate good revenue for organisation.”- Senior Manager in the Services Industry "HCL Unica is a great ROI Marketing Automation tool.”- Associate Director in the Manufacturing Industry Read more reviews for Unica here. Everyone at Unica is deeply proud to be honored as a November 2020 Customers’ Choice for Multichannel Marketing Hub. To learn more about this distinction, or to read the reviews written about our products by the IT professionals who use them, please visit the Customers’ Choice announcement. To all of our customers who submitted reviews, thank you! These reviews mold our products and our customer journey, and we look forward to building on the experience that earned us this distinction! If you have a Unica story to share, we encourage you to join the Gartner Peer Insights crowd and weigh in. The GARTNER PEER INSIGHTS CUSTOMERS’ CHOICE badge is a trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc., and/or its affiliates, and is used...
Marketing & Commerce | November 12, 2020
Manage TVC-Grid Validation in Unica Plan – A Systematic Way
Marketers are always looking for tools and processes to manage their marketing operations, streamline workflows, optimize the budget spend, resources, and manage other marketing assets. MRM is a single solution that can take care of all your needs, from strategic planning to executing a certain marketing activity and ensuring that consistency binds the team together. Unica Plan is the solution that Unica Suite offers to manage all your marketing needs and activities. HCL Unica Plan (Formerly known as Marketing Operations) supports the feature called Tabular View Control (TVC) Grid, where the marketer can choose and arrange the different attributes like Text, Numeric, Date, etc. which they want to use for tracking their business activities. Grids are mainly used for collecting data, in the user interface, it appears like a table or a list. You can enter data into the cells of the grid according to the selected attributes and their data type. Apart from this, the product supports the customization of grid attribute(s) with validation; for example, the attribute should start with a specific character/word OR attribute should not allow entering beyond a certain limit OR attribute should only allow data between a certain range, etc. “com.unicacorp.uap.grid.validation.plugin.GridValidatorPluginImpl” validator is delivered with HCL Unica Plan which can help you to define the validations on-grid attribute(s). This validation plug-in supports two types of rules. ROW: row-level rules are executed first. GRID: grid-level rules are executed after row-level rules. HCL Unica Plan ships with the following sample rules. BeginsWithRule DateCheckRule RangeCheckRule UniqueCheckRule This article will help you to understand the grid validation, data validation rules, and how to implement the ROW level validation using the "BeginsWithRule" rule with the Text Single Line Type attribute. Let’s follow the step by step approach to learning the validation. Create the new grid frame using the Form...
Marketing & Commerce | October 28, 2020
Identify the best offer using A/B Testing in Unica Interact
Every marketer aims to achieve better click rates, easy conversions, reduce the churn rate, and create a memorable experience for their customers. To accomplish it, the decisions they take while sending out emails, designing CTAs, landing pages, and even sending out offers should be inline with the customer they are targeting. To avoid the assumptions of what shall work and what won't, A/B testing, also known as split testing, is the marketing technique that utilizes two versions of the webpage, application, offers, email, or any other marketing asset to analyze and understand which one performs better. A/B testing is essential as different customers may react differently to varied situations. For example, some might want the 'Buy Now' button in the center of the page, and others might like on the bottom right corner. But which one of them leads to the most conversions? Is the answer that A/B testing can provide. How A/B Testing works in Interact? In Interact, an A/B Testing is a test done for a treatment rule with all its properties fixed, but only one parameter varies. In 12.1, this parameter is a combination of offer and its offer attributes. In an A/B testing of a rule, each varying-parameter represents one branch with audience distribution percentage. Depending on the response of the Audience for an Offer in a set Test Period, you can choose the best suitable offer for that treatment rule. Set up A/B Testing for Treatment Rule A new option A/B, is added to the Rule menu; you can directly land to A/B Testing pane by using it. On A/B Testing tab, you can enable A/B Test for a Rule by selecting Enabled Check Box. After enabling the A/B Test for a Rule, a Default branch will be added by copying details from the base...
a/icon/common/search Created with Sketch.